The History of Perception and Studying of D. E. Minh’s Creative Works in the Russian Literary Criticism

Жаткин Д. Н., Милотаева О. С. The History of Perception and Studying of D. E. Minh’s Creative Works in the Russian Literary Criticism (2015)

Жаткин Д. Н., Милотаева О. С. The History of Perception and Studying of D. E. Minh’s Creative Works in the Russian Literary Criticism // Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. — 2015.

Аннотация

The review of the materials connected with studying and perception of works of the poet-translator Dmitry Egorovich Minh (1818–1885) in the Russian literary criticism is for the first time presented in the article. It is noted that D. E. Minh's activity connected with the creation of the first poetic translation of "The Divine Comedy" by Dante and new interpretations of separate poems of F. Schiller steadily attracted attention of modern to the translator Russian writers and critics, in particular, S.P.Shevyrev, I. I. Panayev, A. V. Druzhinin, N. G. Chernyshevsky, M. L. Mikhaylov, N. A. Nekrasov, A. V. Nikitenko, N. A. Dobrolyubov, Ya. N. Turunov, etc.; thus other aspects of Minh’s creative works, first of all, of his interpretation of English poetry didn't cause interest, except the translations of fragments of J. Krabb’s poems that was caused by specifics of public life of the second half of the 1850th in particular, relevance (in connection with cancellation of a serfdom) of a country question and growth of social contradictions. Essential strengthening of D. E. Minh’s literary reputation was promoted by a posthumous appearance in 1902-1904 of a full translation of "The Divine Comedy" and Pushkin award for it in 1907; subsequently the given translation became a reference point for new generations of the writers addressing to interpretation of Dante’s immortal creation (V. Ya. Bryusov, M. L. Lozinsky). The considerable interest shown to Minh's creative works by bibliographers and authors of reference books of the end of the XIX-XXth centuries (D.D.Yazykov, A. V. Mezyer, I. V. Dobrolyubov, S.D.Yakhontov, S. A. Vengerov, M. M. Kowalewski, I.F.Masanov, N.P.Smirnov-Sokolsky, I. M. Levidova, V. T. Danchenko, etc.), for a long time was combined with a certain limitation of attention to it from the literary critics generally briefly mentioning the translator’s activity at judgment of boundary problems, such as the Russian reception of U. Morris (M.P. Alekseev), perception of Shakespearean dramatic art in Russia in 1870 – 1880s (K. I. Rovda), Dante's creative works and his influence on the Russian and world culture (A. K. Dzhivelegov, I. N. Golenishchev-Kutuzov, A. A. Asoyan, etc.) strict censorship at the edition of the translations of the Italian literature in Russia (R. M. Gorokhova), Russian translations of R. Byorns’s poems (Yu. D. Levin), etc.

Ключевые слова

D. E. Minh, poetry, tradition, literary translation, comparative study, literary criticism, bibliography, cross-cultural communication, international historical and cultural and literary relations, reception, continuity, literary detail

Скачать

Творчество Н. Д. Хвощинской глазами современников (опыт обобщения прижизненной литературной критики)

Куликова Н. Е. Критические жанры Публикация

Статьи С. Н. Дурылина о славянофилах: А. С. Хомяков

Белоножко В. А. Критические жанры Публикация

Об одном давнем «парадоксе»: Жанр маргиналий А. С. Пушкина на «Опытах в стихах и прозе» К. Н. Батюшкова

Кошелев В. А. Критические жанры Публикация

Иностранные рецензии на «Историю государства Российского» в восприятии

Сапченко Л. А. Литкритика и патриотизм Публикация
Новости 1 - 4 из 375
Начало | Пред. | 1 2 3 4 5 | След. | Конец | Все